What do the latest numbers say?
The infection is still on the rise, and in some areas acutely, it is clear that recent restrictions on controlling the virus have been effective or have not yet reached a sufficient level. A further 107 new cases were recorded on Wednesday, down slightly from the previous day’s 143, but that is enough to show that the epidemic continues to grow. For the second day in a row, 71 people were reported dead.
Is it as bad as spring?
With the first wave of infections, the test was minimal and so the number of infections recorded per day is the iceberg’s peak ip infection rate more accurate reflection of the epidemic size today, but many cases are still left out. Back in March and April there could be more than a million new infections every day. This now compares with estimates of national statistics in the office which now accounts for about 10,000 cases. At a news conference on Wednesday, England’s chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, and the government’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Valence, were challenged that previous predictions for their second wave were too tragic – about 200 people would die in a single day in mid-November – but they stuck with their guns. Broadly stuck the second wave could get out of control very easily and quickly.
How is the epidemic different?
In the spring, the United Kingdom was one of the few countries in Europe to experience a nationwide outbreak, one in Italy and one in Spain, its outbreaks were widespread, but more regional. The latest data shows that in England, the number of untimely cases is increasing at the moment
The worst-hit areas are the Northwest, the Northeast, Yorkshire and the Humber, and parts of the West Midlands. These uprisings have triggered a severe local lockdown, but it is clear that the country as a whole is at risk. The Hittites were not enthusiastic about the possibility of the virus in a handful of regions. “We’ve had a long winter before us,” he said.
Is the outbreak still managed by young people?
As seen in other adolescents, young people are still recording the newest infections, while these infections spread to older, more at-risk groups, leading to hospitalizations, intensive care admissions, and tragic deaths. The most striking increase is between 19 and 21-year-olds where the weekly percentage test positive for the virus has doubled in September alone to about 13%. The best news is that infections among school-age children are largely flat.
What are the effects on the elderly?
Numerous voices have been heard throughout the pandemic, allowing the virus to be torn down by young and healthy viruses in the hope of boosting the animal’s immunity and eventually allowing it to return to normal. But many scientists say that as the number of cases increases, so will the number of deaths. The latest charts show an increase in hospital admissions as the number of cases in England increases. Since the end of August, admissions among the most aged, 85-year-olds and older, have risen sharply, with the proportion of caregivers increasing as the ratio has risen from three to 13 per 100,000. Admission growth between admissions 5 to 64 years of age was almost steep ep but all the small optics in the age group of 15 to 44 years were also seen in very young people.
More and more people at the hospital have been admitted to high-dependence and intensive care units, over 65 years of age and there has been a sharp increase, but others between the ages of 45 and 64 have also been admitted. Hospitals in the Northwest, Northeast and Yorkshire are trending admissions in line with Covid-1 hot hotspots, but the Midlands and London are also growing exponentially.
Is another national lockdown on the rise?
Boris Johnson made it clear that he was reluctant to issue a second national lockdown order.
He pleaded for tolerance, but did not announce any new measures on the virus infection, even to the frustration of some. “What’s going to be different next week than last week? There’s no new support for isolating people. There was no speech addressed to the curfew crowd,” tweeted Susan Mishi, a professor of UCL health psychology and a member of the SJ behavioral sub-group.
Some scientists advising the government have not backed down from calling for tougher restrictions. Professor John Edmunds, a SJ member of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that ministers in epidemic control were again too short, too late. The government’s chief scientific adviser did not think so. “Growing issues have certainly led us in the wrong direction,” he said, referring to the growing number of cases. “There is evidence of it spreading everywhere and everyone should be cautious across the country,” he said.