Climate change: How can rich people help save the planet?

The more things you have and the more you travel, the more fossil fuels are burned and more greenhouse gases are released into the atmosphere.

Wandering around, buying luxury goods, keeping the mansions warm and driving super cars – they all have a carbon footprint.

However, some argue that the rich can do their best to correct the climate crisis. Here’s how they can make a difference.

Spend wisely

Buying decisions of the rich mean more than most people in tackling climate change.

Ilona Otto and her colleagues at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research estimated The typical “super-rich” household for two people (where they are identified to have a net asset of more than $ 1 million, excluding their main home) has 129 tons of CO2 carbon footprint per year. This is about 65 tons of CO2 per person per year, which is more than 10 times the global average.

Otto stated that the numbers were explanatory because the sample in the study was small. “Probably our estimates are even lower than real millionaire emissions,” he said.

“The rich can change a lot in terms of their lifestyle choices,” said Otto. “For example, they put solar panels on the roofs of their homes. They can also afford electric cars, and it would be best if they avoid flying.”

In the study, air travel made up more than half the footprint of a super-rich couple.

German architect Aktivhaus says that this house produces twice as much energy as it consumes.

Rich people also have the flexibility to make changes.

“A high-income consumer is likely to have access and can get more climate-friendly products or products from local farmers,” adds Tom Bailey, who contributes to a new income. report This emphasizes consumption in high-income cities.

“High-income cities and high-income individuals also have the resources to try new products, services and solutions.” The minister said, adding that they have the capacity to create a market for more sustainable goods.

See also  Putin has its own 'disinfection tunnel' to fight coronavirus


Rich people can choose which industries to invest or not to invest, as well as choosing what to spend.

Oxfam estimates He pointed out that the number of billionaires with commercial interests in the fossil fuel industry on the Forbes list rose from 54 in 2010 to 88 in 2010, and the size of their wealth increased from $ 200 billion to over $ 300 billion.
Steam rises from a coal-fired power station in Germany.

However, there is a tendency for wealthy investors to sell their shares in industries that damage climate, known as deprivation.

Over 1,100 organizations and 59,000 people with a total assets of $ 8.8 trillion in total promised to eliminate fossil fuels through online action divestınvest.
Among them there is a Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprioSigned hostage on behalf of himself and his environment Building foundation – and a group of 22 wealthy individuals from the Netherlands pawned remove their personal wealth from the top 200 oil, gas and coal companies.

“You don’t invest in coal, you don’t invest in oil, gas, regular cars, or some auto companies that produce aviation, so you’re driving financial flows,” said Otto. Said.

And with liquidation, it can go a long way. “We have made some simulations that show that you don’t have to liquidate everyone with the liquidation movement,” said Otto. Said. “If the minority of investors is out of hand, other investors will not invest in these fossil fuel assets because they will be afraid of losing money … even if they don’t have environmental concerns.”

See also  Protesters toppled Francis Scott key sculpture in San Francisco Park

Wealth means power

Rich people can have not only economic decision makers but also political influence. They can finance political parties and campaigns and have access to lawmakers.

Today there is more CO2 in the atmosphere since the evolution of humans

Otto argued that rich people could use their political powers to make positive changes in climate forces.

“People with the highest emissions have the highest agency to change something,” said Otto. Said. “There is a lot of research on the poor, the effects of climate change on the poor … sustainable development goals and so on. But when it comes to action and sustainability and transformation, the poor cannot do anything because they are busy surviving.

“But educated, rich and super rich – it’s a completely different situation. They have the money and resources to act, and they also have social networks.”

Finance climate research

The rich can also support climate research. Microsoft founder Bill Gates made a commitment to finance $ 2 billion of his fortune in research and development on clean energy in 2015.

Can coral farms save our reefs?
A group of scientists in May Wrote To request an “extraordinary increase” in financing environmental and climate issues to 100 rich charities and their families in the UK.

In the letter, “We ask that you urgently consider important investments to prevent further ecological disaster through your personal investments or philanthropy.”

There are many incentives for the rich to demand climate action: A recent UN report warned that delaying climate policies will cost the best companies in the world over $ 1.2 trillion over the next 15 years.

Role models

Super rich can also have an impact on other people’s carbon emissions.

See also  Trump denies having information about Russia-Taliban award in US troops

“The high status in our societies remains associated with high material wealth.” Said. “It is a desire to be very rich and you imitate the lifestyles of the people you want to be.”

For example, air travel is no longer just a treat of the super rich. This year, the budget airline Ryanair became the only non-coal facility among the 10 largest emitters in Europe.

According to EU data, Ryanair is among the largest greenhouse gas emitters in the EU. Ranking is power plants, production facilities and aviation.
“As a society, we have to look for new ways to lead” rich “lives independent of material wealth,” said Bern Moser, University of Bern, Switzerland. found indicates that a person’s carbon footprint is better marked by their income and their belief in the environment.

“We need to redefine the wealth in our societies so that it is possible to live” a good life “without high greenhouse gas emissions.” Said.

You May Also Like

About the Author: Abbott Hopkins

Analyst. Amateur problem solver. Wannabe internet expert. Coffee geek. Tv guru. Award-winning communicator. Food nerd.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *