- The good weather and the return of the sun also mark the return of controversies over the number of people who find themselves out in the midst of a coronovirus epidemic.
- More attention on the outside, which can be counterproductive in the fight against the virus.
- What if instead of counting people in parks, we tried to deal with closed-space groups?
This weekend was decorated with the most beautiful rays of the sun and a beautiful blue sky in most parts of the country. As it happened before, there is no doubt that there will be many people outside. The outing, which will, as usual, lead to lewd comments and dependent articles on these alleged unconscious people who prefer to walk in the park or in the water to follow the instruction to “stay at home”.
Why so much hate? Robert Zuilli, a clinical psychologist specializing in emotions, explains these skin reactions in two ways. Either for fear of a rebound in the epidemic of coronovirus, or angrily allow ourselves to see other people do not dare to agree: “Then there is a sense of injustice …” They are out of place. Why take advantage when I force myself to stay home? “”. The psychologist even manages to explain the strange phenomenon of the people themselves, criticizing the number of people outside: “We will pay attention to details, find that in a group we are very close to each other Stand up, that a person wears his mask badly, or that those people go out for the wrong reasons … We always find more leverage in those people than others, which explains this outrage. And then From, this idea of injustice: “Why can they be more trivial with obstruction measures than us?”.
But does this repeated resentment really make sense? Doctor Yvonne Le Flohick noted that all scientific studies show that the overwhelming majority of bunches are carried out in closed locations: “the virus does not develop externally, but occurs in closed and poorly ventilated locations”. Restricting access to forests or beaches, as we see more and more in high-incidence departments, or being annoyed by people outside on weekends, would really make no sense.
It will not be a question of typing when next to it. “When we ban beaches or are obliged to wear masks, we do not attack indoor groups: food in closed places, schools, hospitals, nursing homes”, notes Yvonne Le Floic. For him, it is anything but a coincidence that the most effective remedy is at the respective locations: the closure of restaurants, bars, sports halls and any place without a house of masks. But now “tightening the screw by restricting access to the outside to fight against the coronovirus will not bring new benefits, or too marginal”, supports a strategy from the doctor, “to do more where the virus is actively transmitted.” Happens, “Reduce where it is not broadcast. “
Measures for measures
Make no mistake, the risks of inter-personal contamination are not zero on the outside. “But it is limited to just that, contamination between two individuals, and not in groups as one can observe them in closed places”, indicates Yvonne Le Floic. Pre-publication covering 25,000 cases of MedRxiv in October 2020, 6% of cases were related to environments with an external component. But these occurred in very specific contexts, such as sports, parties or concerts, where physical disturbances are not respected, where people stay together for too long and where they are likely to speak or speak out loud. – So many accelerators of contamination. For the doctor, “to think that a risk is contaminated by walking on the beach ten meters from each other makes no sense”.
How then can we explain that most of the new measures concern externally? Two hypotheses dominate. First, a misunderstanding of the disease, which is still occasionally transmitted through direct physical contact rather than through the respiratory tract and droplets. Second, “because it is easier to ban a beach or park than to ban and identify groups and take necessary measures.” It is more about communication to have the illusion of moving forward, “Yavon le Floich is a bit desperate.
All this is not without consequence. In addition to creating a diversion, it focuses on the outside “affects the communication on the importance of ventilation, such as enclosed spaces, such as classrooms”. It is difficult to request both in favor of renewal of air coming from outside at the same time, while presenting the outside as a zone of high transmission of the virus.
The result is not mentioned on French morale. Yvon le Flohic continues: “This over-attention to the outside world has also become a social problem: we have reached a year of pandemics and will not try to deprive as many Frenchmen as possible for Robert Zulli Will not be dangerous “, health is important even in times of crisis, to indulge in happiness – certainly it is not dangerous for oneself or for others. Walking outside, leaving your home, getting some fresh air, it can do a lot of mental good for people. Just enough to take a little breath.
Analyst. Amateur problem solver. Wannabe internet expert. Coffee geek. Tv guru. Award-winning communicator. Food nerd.