Justice Secretary Robert Buckland has faced calls to resign over the government’s plan to disregard international law after another senior law official, Lord Cain, resigned without continuing to support controversial policy.
Downing Street has confirmed Kane’s departure as Scotland’s Advocate General. In his resignation letter, he said, “It has become increasingly difficult to restore what I consider my obligation as a law officer with your policy intentions.”
It came a week after the resignation of the government’s top lawyer, Jonathan Jones – and drew attention to Buckland, who was also Lord Chancellor, and Attorney General, Suela Braverman.
A tour source close to Kane said he had offered to resign after a clash with Brewerman on Tuesday night in a private discussion about the domestic market bill.
The Guardian revealed last week that Kane said he believed the government’s efforts to scrap the EU withdrawal agreement would violate the law in the cabinet. Solicitors General Braverman and Michael Ellis only emphasized the ministerial code on UK law violations.
What is the UK domestic market bill?
The purpose of the Internal Market Bill is to enforce appropriate regulations relating to trade in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Some rules, for example, closer to food safety or air quality, which were previously determined by the EU agreement, will now be regulated by the Confused Administration or Westminster. The domestic market bill emphasizes that even if their standards differ locally, corrupt countries must accept goods and services from all UK countries.
The government has said it is confident that the standards and rules are consistent, in part to ensure that international traders have access to the UK as a whole.
The Scottish government has criticized it as a “power grab” in Westminster and the Welsh government has expressed fears that it could bring down a rivalry. For example, any one country in the UK lowers their standards for importing chlorinated chicken, if the other three countries also have to accept chlorinated chicken.
This has become even more controversial because one of its main goals is to give ministers the power to pass legislation even if it is contrary to the withdrawal agreement with the EU under the Northern Ireland Protocol.
The text does not disguise its purpose, stating that the powers contained in the bill “affect any relevant international or domestic law that may be inconsistent or inconsistent”.
Martin Bellam And Owen Baukot
An international agreement – Buckland was pressured on Wednesday whether he should resign without supporting a law that would give ministers the power to bypass the withdrawal agreement. He said that if the law cannot be broken in such a way, he will only do so if the law is violated. He told Sky News the government was not yet at that stage.
Former Conservative Attorney General Dominic Greaves has called on both Buckland and Braverman to resign without upholding international law.
Greve told the Guardian: “The attorney general seems to be an ardent supporter of a completely closed view of international law. He and Ellis do not appear to have provided any legal precedent for their comments. [breaking] International law is theirs [advice to the government].
“I am afraid that I think the position of the Lord Chancellor is more obvious as he swears to support or defend the rule of law. The rule of law includes international law.
“While I feel a little sympathy for the position their former colleagues have been given, I think [Buckland’s] The position is indomitable. He should, I fear, resign on the day the bill is released. He may have decided to stay and try and stay moderate [the government’s position]. I understand this from a moral standpoint but I think it is wrong.
Former Conservative Solicitor General Lord Garnier praised Kane for taking the honorable step and called on Braverman, Ellis and Buckland to consider their positions.
“I question why law enforcement officers are still in office,” he told the Guardian. “Richard Kane has fought hard to get the government to act. It was an unequal fight. I thank him for what he has tried to do. He has now done the right thing in terms of resignation. I hope Richard Keane’s departure will make AG [attorney general], The Solicitor General and the Lord Chancellor look very closely at their positions. “
Joanna Cherry, a senior lawyer and spokeswoman for the Scottish National Party in Westminster, said she had done the right thing by proposing his resignation, but that the six Scottish Turis who voted in favor of the move earlier this week raised new questions.
“No official in Scottish jurisprudence can handle the respect that Boris Johnson and his government have shown for the rule of law with his responsibilities or obligations as a Scottish court official.”
“It simply came to our notice then that the Tory government could not be trusted. And that puts Douglas Ross and the six polar Scottish Tory MPs who voted in favor of the bill in a completely open and completely ineligible place. “
Ross, the new leader of Scotland’s Torres, had previously tried to distance himself from Downing Street by resigning as minister in the summer in protest of Dominic Cummings’ lockdown drive to Durham.
Lord Falconer, the shadow attorney general, said: “The Lord Chancellor is a decent man and a good lawyer. Lord Kane and Jonathan Jones, both serious lawyers, went. The Lord cannot remain chancellor and is expected to be taken as a serious lawyer.
Following a tasty exchange with Falconer over Kane’s resignation law, Kane at the time told Northern Ireland’s secretary, Brandon Lewis, that he had “answered the wrong question” when the bill would break the law.
On Wednesday, Lewis explicitly opposed it, telling lawmakers on the Northern Ireland Committee: “I spoke to Lord Kane when he looked at the specific question he asked me last week. He agreed with me that the answer I gave was correct. The answer I gave reflects the legal advice of the government. ”
No 10 sources suggested why he had been close to resigning for several days, and said he had not spoken to the prime minister on Wednesday.
His departure came despite a compromise on Downing Street with Conservative rebels who refused to return the domestic market bill in the second reading on Monday – and the prime minister insisted he was only accepting “belts and braces” in the Brexit talks. .
The Guardian understands that he had already told friends to stay “on the ship”. One colleague said: “I think that’s what he was doing.”
Former shadow attorney general Lady Chakraborty, who crossed the box to the House of Lords, confronted Kane: “All true conservatives will search for their lives today. Governments on both sides have violated domestic and international law in this century; sometimes catastrophic.”
“But they have never bragged about it before. There are not enough police officers on the planet to enforce the rule of law. If we were there, who would protect us from them and their paymasters? It’s not conservatism at work, it’s something more horrible. It has grown in Europe before and it never ends. “