Not! It is not true that according to the United Kingdom “vaccinated people are at risk of immunosuppression”.

«Alarm from the United Kingdom: vaccinated people at risk of becoming immunosuppressed» headlines an article published by Truth Signed by Doctor No Wax Silvana De Mari. Published on page 11 in the December 29, 2021 print edition, it has been shared via Facebook in several . was shared via screenshot Reporting of some key parts. However, it is an old hoax that has spread overseas in recent months, which has already been treated by some colleagues, the “sister” we talked about in a previous article with the elusive vads (a type of “vaccine” caused by AIDS”).

for the quick

  • The UK report’s story and the risk of immunosuppression stems from an article on an English-language site published on October 15, 2021.
  • Articles published in English and translated into Italian do not in any way demonstrate the existence of the phantom syndrome known as Vaid.
  • Article D Truth Excluding all other references and findings, UK cites only one of the antibody tests reported in the document.
  • source of Truth, British surveillance report 42, does not highlight the risk of immunosuppression.

Analysis

Here is one of the Facebook posts where a screenshot of the article has been shared with the following comment: «Alarm from the United Kingdom: Vaccinated people are at risk of becoming immunosuppressed. The Health Protection Agency estimates that after the second dose, the ability to resist the virus is impaired. Whereas the spread of a variant with a very low lethality can solve the epidemic.

To go over the topic mentioned in the title of the article, it is necessary to read below, towards the end:

In the ‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report’ from Week 42, the UK Health Protection Agency acknowledged on page 23 that ‘N antibody levels appear to be low in people who get infection after two vaccination doses’ and that a Permanent event. , The report shows that vaccinated adults will now be infected at much higher rates than the unvaccinated, confirming data from all highly vaccinated countries. The vaccine may therefore interfere with the innate ability to produce antibodies, making them more vulnerable to variations in the spike, while the unvaccinated will develop more lifelong immunity. at the first infection. You can find it on page 24 of this link: shorturl.at/vwyFO

The link shown is not working, but we are still able to locate the source.

See also  Biden employee friendly search: Nation's consideration on the race machines during the last month of the election process

It ran in October 2021

place Expose, via an article on 30 October 2021 and “The UK government reports that fully immunized vaccines are rapidly increasing the risk of developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and immune system decline in children has now begun”, in which we hypothesized Let’s talk about vaccine immunodepression. However, it is not the primary source.

an article on the site eventivversinews.it Headlines like this: «Survey – Official Report of the British Government. Will there be a fully vaccinated developed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome by the end of the year?’ The publication date is 23 October 2021 and is quoted by adding to the document reported by Silvana de Mari in her article dated 29 December 2021.

A few days ago, on October 17th, 2021. The same “news” was reported in a blog called voices from the street,

The primary source site for all of these sites appears to be beforeitsnews.com and article published on 15 October 2021 “Comparison of official government reports suggests fully immunized Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndromes are developing much faster than anticipated”. The structure of the articles is practically the same.

English official sources warning

coworkers of health response A fact-check dated November 5, 2021 had dealt with this subject. A first element that is highlighted is the warning of the Week 42 report (on page 12) cited in the article by Silvana de Mari. Truth And from all the other sites before them:

These data should be considered in the context of the vaccination status of the population groups shown in the rest of this report. The vaccination status of cases, patients and deaths is not the most appropriate method for assessing the effectiveness of vaccination and there is a high risk of misinterpretation. Vaccine effectiveness has been formally estimated from several different sources and has been described earlier in this report. […]

Case rates in vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations are crude rates that do not take into account statistical biases inherent in the data. There is likely to be a systematic difference in who wants to be tested and who is at risk of COVID-19 among those who have been vaccinated.

These biases become more pronounced as more and more people are vaccinated and the differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations become systematically unvaccinated without a formal analysis of vaccine effectiveness. As clarified.

In practice, the same document warns that taking into account the vaccination status of the cases in question is not an appropriate method for evaluating the effectiveness of vaccines.

See also  China and India's trade and technology ties are at risk as border dispute increases

Chapter excerpted from La Verita

The document on pages 23 and 24, cited in the article by Silvana de Mari, does not raise any “alarms” and does not in any way confirm that there is a risk of being immunosuppressed. Both pages are part of a chapter entitled “Vaccine Effects on the Proportion of the Population with Antibodies to COVID-19,” which takes into account the Roche nucleoprotein (N) and Roche spike (S) tests that are used for two different types of vaccine. Antibodies are used for detection. : first (Roche N) those after infection, second (Roche S) both after infection and those that are induced by the vaccine. Everything is explained on page 19.

Article D Truth He refers to only one of two tests: “N antibody levels appear to be low in people who get the infection after two doses of vaccination.” Not only that, on page 24, quoted by La Verita, we read the following (the bold is ours):

Comparing Figure 6 with Figure 7, the overall higher profile of antibody levels is evident in those who experienced a previous infection; Post-vaccination infection and post-vaccination breakthrough infection are expected to boost both current antibody levels, Researchers around the world are working to better understand what antibody levels mean in terms of protection against COVID-19, The current thinking is that there is no threshold antibody level that provides complete protection against infection, but instead high antibody levels are likely to be associated with a reduced chance of infection.

In a nutshell, the document states that vaccines and infection (before or after vaccination) are expected to increase existing antibodies, but still lay our hands on a fact: at the moment a threshold level of antibodies that is not known Allows a complete protection against infection.

See also  "English laugh Boris Johnson"

Conclusion

The documents cited by Silvana De Mari in the La Verita article, as well as previous articles published in Italian and which take an English-language site published on October 15, 2021, do not in any way demonstrate the principle of risk. of immunosuppression from covid-19 vaccines.

This article contributes Facebook Project To fight fake news and propaganda on our social platforms. Reading Who For more information about our partnership with Facebook.

Read also:

You May Also Like

About the Author: Forrest Morton

Organizer. Zombie aficionado. Wannabe reader. Passionate writer. Twitter lover. Music scholar. Web expert.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *