Go to Mars, it’s good. It’s even better to walk there. But all this will require energy. especially electricity. And also on earth, now the question arises how to produce it. As on Earth, Solar and Nuclear each want to pull a blanket for themselves. Which of the two will be victorious? Researchers have their own view.
Experts say it again and again in the context ofthat we live, resist And there is no point in producing renewable electricity. On Earth anyway. But now this debate has suddenly reached an unexpected height. By exporting to Mars. While most of the engineers working on this question validated the nuclear option as the best option, (United States) revealed today that solar could generate all the electricity they would need for future Martian colonists. For an extended mission and even for a permanent installation on the Red Planet.
remember thathas been working for many years on the development of small nuclear reactors called , Reactors that can operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. and that engineers today consider safe and effective in supporting exploration But also humans from Mars.
Ale’, it presents itself with some of the same shortcomings we know on earth. The electricity thus produced must be stored if it is to be used at night. and on Mars, Dust sometimes covers the sky, covering everything with a red veil. we remember that from nasa In 2019, one of these storms was broken due to the storm.
Difficulty estimating energy needs
But the University of California researchers didn’t want to stop there. To compare the two solutions, he opted for a systematic approach. taking into account oneIn 480 days, a travel time of about 420 days is included. Because they don’t know what energy would be needed for such a mission, Created a mathematical model to explore different scenarios. For example scenarios including the need for temperature and pressure control for the production of fertilizers Mars will supply Joe’s propellant for methane production Intended for return to Earth or for the production of bioplastics.
They combined these needs with the production possibilities of nuclear kilopower and photovoltaic generation systems with three storage options. simple battery productionDirectly by photoelectrochemical cells or by hydrogen production , a hydrogen that could then be used on Earth to supply some hypotheses During the night of Mars or during the famous dust storms.
Solar power may be the most interesting
As a result, on nearly half of Mars’ surface – particularly in the equatorial regions – solar energy is ultimately presented as a more interesting solution than nuclear power. If and only if, however, solar production is combined with a hydrogen electrolysis system.
A question of efficiency, but above all, of the weight of the solar panels. to a landing site nearFor example, researchers estimate that the total weight of the on-board solar panels for a rocket carrying a 100-ton payload – as well as a hydrogen storage system – would be about 8.3 tons. -, as compared to 9.5. Ton for Kilopower reactor system. Probably enough to consider carrying an emergency panel. Which would not be possible for a nuclear system. However, the researchers point out that their work is valid only when we consider the recently developed flexible solar panels. lighter because they do without structures or even glass supports are traditionally seen of our good old earth.
Analyst. Amateur problem solver. Wannabe internet expert. Coffee geek. Tv guru. Award-winning communicator. Food nerd.