Human rights in China: lawsuit against Samsung for “misleading marketing practices” ends

Human rights in China: lawsuit against Samsung for “misleading marketing practices” ends

Samsung’s French subsidiary’s indictment for “deceptive business practices” has been definitively quashed, with the Court of Cassation dismissing an appeal by NGOs accusing the company of human rights violations in factories was consulted, especially in China, pursuant to a decision. AFP on Wednesday.

“The Court of Cassation finds that there is no instrument of such a nature to permit the acceptance of an appeal”, can we read in the ruling on Tuesday by the Supreme Court of the French Judicial Order.

The French subsidiary of the South Korean electronics giant was indicted in 2019 for “deceptive commercial practices”.

The prosecuting judge was seized for investigation based on a complaint with civil action by NGOs Sherpa and ActionAid-People’s Solidairs, which he filed after quashing several of the procedures he had initiated.

Samsung then indicated that it opposed the “merits” of the complaint and assured that it was “responsible to ensure that Samsung Electronics, its suppliers and subcontractors protect working conditions and the environment as well as the local Follow best practices regarding compliance with regulations.

In 2021, the complaint was finally deemed inadmissible on appeal on the grounds that NGOs did not have the authority to take legal action against “deceptive commercial practices”.

This decision resulted in the void of the process and therefore the quashing of Samsung France’s indictment, which is now final.

“This case seriously harms access to law justice,” Sherpa and ActionAid said in a press release published Wednesday.

According to the NGOs, “This decision strengthens the possibility for multinationals to leverage CSR marketing campaigns with ethical commitments, without any concerns they do not respect in practice”.

In their complaint, the NGOs accused the electronics group of not honoring its ethical commitments, although it was announced on its website.

Based on various reports from NGOs that were able to visit the group’s factories in China, South Korea, and Vietnam, Sherpa and ActionAid specifically described “the employment of children under the age of sixteen”, “with respect to human dignity”. with inconsistent working and housing conditions”. and “dangerous workers”.

Samsung did not immediately respond to AFP’s requests.

In 2021, consumer union UFC-Que Choisir also filed a complaint in Paris with a civil action for misleading business practices targeting the group.

See also  Republicans unable to resist ominous themes as working day two of conference looms | Republican nationwide convention 2020

You May Also Like

About the Author: Hanley Mallin

Internet geek. Wannabe bacon enthusiast. Web trailblazer. Music maven. Entrepreneur. Pop culture fan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.